<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: art history as individualised recapitulation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://almf.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/art-history-as-individualised-recapitulation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://almf.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/art-history-as-individualised-recapitulation/</link>
	<description>_____________diar-retic responses to cultural stimuli through varying degrees of brow ____________________________________ _____________(a local art history)_____________________________________________________________________________________</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:13:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rjs</title>
		<link>http://almf.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/art-history-as-individualised-recapitulation/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>rjs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 02:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://almf.wordpress.com/?p=12#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I think you and I have similar opinions, especially when it comes to art criticism.  I just started a blog about Texas Contemporary Art. I am interested to have your input.  My blog&#039;s address is texasartsnob.wordpress.com.  If nothing else, you should keep going.  I think we&#039;re heading in the right direction.
Sincerely,
RJS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you and I have similar opinions, especially when it comes to art criticism.  I just started a blog about Texas Contemporary Art. I am interested to have your input.  My blog&#8217;s address is texasartsnob.wordpress.com.  If nothing else, you should keep going.  I think we&#8217;re heading in the right direction.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
RJS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
